Insurance Advocacy

For Psychologists

Insurance Advocacy
Get InvolvedJoin Us

Insurance Reimbursement Advocacy

Ensuring fair and timely reimbursement for psychological services is essential to protecting access to care for Connecticut residents and supporting the viability of behavioral health practices.

The Legislative Advocacy Committee of the Connecticut Psychological Association (CPA) is actively working to address insurance reimbursement challenges that impact psychologists and other behavioral health providers across the state. These challenges include:

  • Delayed or denied payments for covered services

  • Unjustified or vague explanations of benefit denials

  • Retrospective claim audits and clawbacks

  • Non-transparent reimbursement policies

  • Inadequate parity with medical services

These issues not only strain the financial stability of independent and group practices, but they also reduce access to essential mental health care for Connecticut patients.

Share Your Stories

Help Us Advocate For Change!

Since launching our mental health parity advocacy efforts in 2019, CPA has relied on real-world data from Connecticut psychologists to support and strengthen our legislative efforts on behalf of both providers and patients.

Insurance-related concerns—including clawbacks, reduced or delayed payments, and unclear reimbursement processes—remain a central focus of our advocacy. To better understand these issues and continue building a strong case for change, we’ve created a brief, open-ended survey where providers can share their experiences.

We welcome your input—even if your issue has already been resolved.

Your responses will be reviewed by CPA’s Legislative Advocacy Committee and used to inform our current and future advocacy strategies. Individual responses will be collated and kept confidential, and no identifying information will be shared publicly without your explicit permission.

At the end of the survey, please provide your contact information so that we may reach out to clarify details of your submission or to invite you to support our broader advocacy efforts. 

For any questions, please contact us at: info@connpsych.org

CPA's Insurance Clawback Advocacy

CPA's Insurance Clawbacks Report 2023

Learn about the prevalence of insurance 'clawbacks' and proposed recommendations to help resolve the devastating effects on providers and patients.

“Clawbacks” are when an insurance company takes back funds it initially paid to a provider who delivered a service.  Typically, clawbacks occur when the insurance company later determines that the service was not covered.  However, insurance companies reclaim funds years after the service was provided and in large quantities that hurt small businesses.  The full report is listed below and can also be viewed CPA Insurance Clawback Report 2023.

CPA's Mental Health Parity Payment Advocacy

CPA & CT Mental Health Parity Coalition

Learn about the the Connecticut Parity Coalition - a group of 24 mental health and behavioral health provider groups that support parity of services for patients and payment for providers.

“Access to mental health care is still seriously impeded by a lack of compliance with the 2019 parity bill.  Insurers are still being found in non-compliance. The annual NQTL report put out by the CT Insurance Department in 2023 reported: “in certain instances there was often a failure to provide to the Department’s satisfaction, sufficient documentation demonstrating compliant parity analysis, in the following areas, in the overall pre-authorization and concurrent and retrospective claims denial rate between SUD, MH and Med/Surg benefits, in the rate of concurrent benefit claims between SUD benefits, MH benefits and Med/Surg benefits, and in the out-of-network and in-network claims rate between MH, SUD and Med/Surg benefits.”  Connecticut’s insurance companies were required to provide annual reports to the insurance commissioner requiring their compliance with the new law in 2021. They did not comply with the template the commissioner provide, instead we got a data dump of overwhelming magnitude that was as worthless as it was intended to be.” Testimony by Dr. Mark Spellmann, CPA Legislative Committee